Get the best experience in our app
Enjoy offline reading, category favourites, and instant updates - right from your pocket.

If Gove can use youth to excuse his illegal drug use...

... surely it’s time to talk about the criminal age of responsibility. Thirty is a lot older than 10, says Pam Jarvis
10th June 2019, 3:34pm

Share

If Gove can use youth to excuse his illegal drug use...

/magazine/archive/if-gove-can-use-youth-excuse-his-illegal-drug-use
Michael Gove

Former education secretary Michael Gove made the news this weekend with his admission of cocaine use - something he repeatedly told Andrew Marr was a

He’s not alone inusing his age as an excuse for poor behaviour.

And yet, the Tory government as a whole has in England (.

include 14 in Russia, North Korea and China, 12 in Saudi Arabia and Egypt … and 10 in England, Wales, Syria and Bhutan. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) has repeatedly asked the UK to raise its criminal age of responsibility to an age”.

England has been the western world’s pariah with respect to its treatment of young offenders since 1998‘smade far-reaching amendments to the English criminal justice system. These changes weren’t based on evidence-based research but a to

The criminal age of responsibility

Watching Gove making excuses for his own behaviour, at the “young”age of 30, over Sunday breakfast was laugh or cry material for those of us who know the history of the: centuries of carefully balanced justice for children and young people, summarily banished at the dawn of the 21st century.

Doli incapax means incapable of wrong. Traditionally in England, the assumption of Doli incapaxapplied from the age of 7 to 14. A child accused of a crime was brought before a judge who decided whether s/he understood what s/he had done was criminal, rather than naughty. If the judge was satisfied that the prosecution could not prove beyond reasonable doubt that the child had full adult understanding of the crime committed, the prosecution was halted due to doli incapax. raising the age at which a child had to be brought before a judge to 10.

Would raising the age of criminal responsibility to age14 mean that children under that age would simply be allowed to “get away”with offending?

Looking to our closest neighbours with higher ages of criminal responsibility, why is itthenthat we don’t find gangs of uncontrollable young children roaming their streets? It’s because the custom of dealing with crime involvingchildren under 14in continental Europe is through child protection and 51 laws,.

This may involve court orders, or even a period living away from home in secure accommodation. On the surface, this may not seem that different to current ways in which England treats its young offenders.

However, the difference that exists is fundamental: the child is not identified as an “offender”at any point in the process, but as a child in need of guidance, and when s/he emerges at the end of the process, s/he has no criminal record. In other words, s/he is treated as a child.

We did not know in 1998 what we know now. Through advances in neuroscience, we’ve discovered that the human brain is not fully adult until it reaches 25 years of age, and that may, in certain social situations, impede self-control.

In a nation where people vying for the role of prime minister are citing youthful impulsiveness as a reason for offending behaviour, do we really need to go into human neuropsychology to make the point that people make mistakes, and that the lack of experience and impetuosity of youth is where our biggest mistakes are usually made?

As Gove points out in his interview, should wethen be made to suffer for these for life, as many have done due to criminal records imposed for such youthful mistakes?

There is currently a bill slowly passing through Parliament.

Perhaps, in the light of politicians citing youth as an excusefor their own criminal behaviour at much older ages, MPs might consider passing this bill into law as quickly as possible. They should also consider raising the age of responsibility to 14, as the UNCRC recommends. This would ensure that caring and reformative responses - rather than punitive ones - are available for those who engage in offending behaviour under this age.

Yes, youth offending must be effectively dealt with to protect all concerned, but surely, as the UNCRC urges us, young offenders shouldfirst be considered aschildren rather than criminals.

Dr Pam Jarvis is a reader in childhood, youth and education at Leeds Trinity University

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read five free articles every month, plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Register with Tes and you can read five free articles every month, plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £4.90 per month

/per month for 12 months

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £4.90 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £4.90 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared